Wednesday, December 15, 2004

Let's talk about the Constitution

Yesterday, Circuit Court Judge Ashley McKathan showed up in his south Alabama courtroom wearing a robe with the ten commandments embroidered on it. I'm a little intrigued--where does one get a robe with the ten commandments embroidered on it and is there time to order one for my dad, The Reverend?--and more than a little disgusted. If we are going to talk in broad, general terms about the separation of church and state, clearly this kind of activity runs afoul of that. I had the unpleasant experience last year of explaining this very concept to my mom, who teaches elementary school, and who was all up in arms that they were not allowed to play Christmas music in the classroom that referenced Jesus. Her fellow teacher was playing the music anyway, and they felt like they were making a great victory for Jesus... I guess. My mom is a public school teacher, just as Judge McKathan is, well, a judge, and whenever they are doing their jobs--paid with taxpayer dollars, as a public servant--they are not just Mom and Mr. McKathan, they are representatives of the State. When they do something, they are not just making an individual stand for what they perceive as right; they are making a public stand about what the Government perceives as right. If a public school teacher plays "Away in a Manger" at Christmas time or a Judge wears the ten commandments on his robe, they, as representatives of the Government (their employer) are singling out Christianity for special recognition. And that clearly violates the spirit of the first amendment. Even if Congress hasn't passed any particular law, the Government--embodied in public school teachers and crazy judges--is acting as if Christianity is the state religion. Eh, fuck it. You know, maybe strict interpretation is the way to go. As long as Congress hasn't passed any "law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," maybe we shouldn't bother to complain. Instead, I'm going to insist on my second amendment rights. The second amendment, for those of you who don't have it memorized, because you aren't either Ted Nugent or a member of the NRA, says: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." In other words, in case we ever have to rise up to protect our freedoms, we need to have adequate weaponry. Well, folks, I've taken a look around the world and a rifle isn't going to cut it. Even a Tennessee full of citizens armed with machine guns is no match for most armies. I demand the right to bear nuclear arms. Just one, a small one that will fit next to the washing machine, but one that makes me a real threat to anyone trying to encroach on my rights.

5 Comments:

Blogger tls said...

I think you may have earned yourself a free pass to my in-laws for Christmas for the rest of your life. It's okay, we already talk about you (usually brought up by my BIL because he loves you) so why not join the party in person sometime?

Talking about Con Law gets the Legal Eagle all riled up. Perhaps you should open a phone sex line for frustrated lawyers...

12/15/2004 10:13:00 AM  
Blogger Aunt B said...

You know, I'd feel really bad if all the money from my phone sex line came from the Legal Eagle's family as they called in to discuss the Constitution or the regret they have over chances not taken.

Okay, I wouldn't feel that bad. It'd be kind of funny. But if it's true that Constitutional law gets your husband hot, I'm afraid he's not going to be allowed in the Politics Bar without a chaperone.

12/15/2004 10:37:00 AM  
Blogger Jack Steiner said...

Hey, if you get a nuke I want one too.

12/15/2004 11:40:00 AM  
Blogger Aunt B said...

Oh, of course you should have a nuke, too. I mean, let's be realistic; the second I got The Bomb, Ted Nugent would so totally run out and get a shed full, which would necessitate everyone who wasn't Ted Nugent also having nukes, just for self-protection.

Does anyone know what Russia is doing with its old weapons? Between the Legal Eagle and I, I think we know enough Russian to make a successful trade, if we could figure out who's holding.

12/15/2004 11:57:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

OK, so your post is called let's talk about the constitution, right? And then there was all the talk about getting excited about conlaw and a phone sex line for lawyers, right? And then there's that song with the refrain, let's talk about sex baby, right? So then you could call your post or your 900 number Let's talk about the constituion, baby and it would be, like, all funny and stuff.

Yep, that's some deep thought right there.

-SuperGenius

12/17/2004 09:01:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home